Some generalisations of linear-graph modelling for dynamic systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proper modelling of a dynamic system can benefit analysis, simulation, design, evaluation and control of the system. The linear-graph (LG) approach is suitable for modelling lumped-parameter dynamic systems. By using the concepts of graph trees, it provides a graphical representation of the system, with a direct correspondence to the physical component topology. This paper systematically extends the application of LGs to multi-domain (mixed-domain or multi-physics) dynamic systems by presenting a unified way to represent different domains – mechanical, electrical, thermal and fluid. Preservation of the structural correspondence across domains is a particular advantage of LGs when modelling mixed-domain systems. The generalisation of Thevenin and Norton equivalent circuits to mixed-domain systems, using LGs, is presented. The structure of an LG model may follow a specific pattern. Vector LGs are introduced to take advantage of such patterns, giving a general LG representation for them. Through these vector LGs, the model representation becomes simpler and rather compact, both topologically and parametrically. A new single LG element is defined to facilitate the modelling of distributed-parameter (DP) systems. Examples are presented using multi-domain systems (a motion-control system and a flow-controlled pump), a multi-body mechanical system (robot manipulator) and DP systems (structural rods) to illustrate the application and advantages of the methodologies developed in the paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it