MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068517031 · doi:10.1109/ceidp.2012.6378919

Influence of aging byproducts on the gassing tendency of transformer oils

2012· article· en· W2068517031 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformer oilDissolved gas analysisHydrocarbonTransformerPetroleum engineeringGas chromatographyPetroleumEnvironmental scienceCrude oilWaste managementChemistryEngineeringOrganic chemistryElectrical engineeringChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dissolved Gas Analysis (DGA) has now become a standard in the utility industry throughout the world and is considered to be the most important oil test for oil-filled power transformers. This article intends to show that the gassing of oil is a more complex phenomenon. Aged oil and reclaimed aged oil samples were submitted thermal and electrical stresses (considering various scenarios) and the dissolved gasses analyzed by chromatography. This contribution provides experimental evidence that the chemical composition of hydrocarbon blend and the oil born decay products are also contributing factors to oil gassing. The influence of oil born decay products onto the diagnostics predicted by some DGA techniques is also emphasized. Although such a research is still in a preliminary stage, some very stimulating results have been obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it