MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068528962 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2012.6345054

Optimal allocation of renewable DG for reliability improvement and losses reduction

2012· article· en· W2068528962 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRenewable energyReduction (mathematics)Reliability (semiconductor)Mathematical optimizationDistributed generationComputer scienceCost reductionInteger programmingGenetic algorithmReliability engineeringLinear programmingNonlinear programmingPower (physics)Nonlinear systemEngineeringMathematicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a methodology to evaluate the cost of energy losses and the cost of interruption in distribution networks with renewable distributed generation (DG) connections. Moreover, it presents a renewable DG allocation planning algorithm to determine the optimum locations and sizes of DG units in distribution network for reliability improvement and energy losses reduction. The proposed approach takes into consideration customers' sectors, load variation, stochastic nature of renewable DG, and variable hourly cost of energy. The allocation planning problem is defined as mixed integer nonlinear programming problem, where genetic algorithm (GA) is utilized. Using the proposed approach, the distribution companies can determine optimum sizes and locations of DG units in their systems; besides, the expected reduction in the energy losses and outages costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207