Effect of Wear on the Performance of Non-Recessed Orifice Compensated Hybrid Journal Bearing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A bearing subjected to frequent start/stop operations is worn progressively due to rubbing. As a consequence, the geometry of the bearing changes and the performance is affected. This paper presents a theoretical study of the performance of an orifice compensated worn non-recessed hole-entry hybrid journal bearing system. The finite element method has been used to solve the Reynolds equation, governing the flow of the lubricant in the clearance space between the journal and the bearing, along with a restrictor flow equation. The global system equation with the orifice restrictor is nonlinear, which is solved by an iterative technique using the Newton-Raphson method. Two types of journal bearing configurations, having symmetrical and asymmetrical distribution of supply holes around the circumferential direction, have been investigated in the present study. The effect of the wear depth on the journal bearing performance characteristics have been presented for a wide range of restrictor design parameters and external loads. The study demonstrates that the wear affects the bearing performance parameters and the degree of variation is affected by the operating condition, the bearing configuration, and the type of restrictor used. The influence of wear can be reduced by a proper selection of the bearing configuration (symmetrical/asymmetrical), the restrictor, and its design parameter. KEY WORDS: WearHybrid Journal BearingOrifice Compensator Acknowledgments Presented at the STLE Annual Meeting in Calgary, Canada, May 7-11, 2006 Final manuscript approved April 27, 2007 Review led by Ted Keith
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it