MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069090745 · doi:10.5539/ass.v9n11p50

Innovative Science Trends That Have Occurred in Zimbabwe

2013· article· en· W2069090745 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anna Gudyanga, Ephias Gudyanga, Judith Mutemeri

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Education, and Development Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Context (archaeology)Focus groupWork (physics)Economic shortageQuality (philosophy)Science educationIndependence (probability theory)SociologyPedagogyPublic relationsMedical educationPsychologyPolitical scienceEngineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper seeks to expose what innovative teaching there is in the Zimbabwean science-teaching context, as well as what opportunities and what challenges there are. Science is the mother of all technology hence no sustainable development can take place in any country without talking about science. Qualitative methodology was used where questionnaires, focus groups and observations were the main tools for this study. Triangulated data was analysed and results showed that from the time Zimbabwe attained independence in 1980, the government has put in place five innovative projects to improve the delivery of science teaching in schools, some of which are Zimbabwe Science Project, Quality Education in Science Teaching and the Science Education In-service Teacher Programme. Teachers are engaging students in hands on activities (Interactive Teaching Strategy), group work, seeding discussion while problem solving, demonstrations, questioning thus providing students with a multi - sensory learning experience. The challenges include brain drain of science teachers into industry and inadequate resources. We recommend that schools must offer the foundation for developing computer skills and knowledge and fund raise to alleviate the shortage of resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicGender, Education, and Development IssuesFrench-language works237,207