MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069208534 · doi:10.1094/pdis.2003.87.12.1538c

First Report of Bronze Leaf Disease on Hybrid Poplar (<i>Populus</i> × <i>canescens</i> ‘Tower’) Caused by <i>Apioplagiostoma populi</i> in Manitoba, Canada

2003· article· en· W2069208534 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTree Root and Stability Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture Food and Rural Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWindbreakBiologyCanopyCrown (dentistry)Ornamental plantHorticultureBotanyWoody plantShootBronzeNettingArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poplars (Populus alba × P. tremula (P. × canescens) (Aiton) Smith cv. Tower) are common ornamental and windbreak trees in Manitoba and across the Canadian prairie provinces because of their rapid growth and columnar growth habit. Bronze leaf disease symptoms have been reported on five poplar species (P. alba, P. canescens, P. grandidentata, P. tremula, and P. tremuloides) (2), and the disease presents a significant barrier to the development and continued use of poplars (1). Elimination of tower poplars would represent a significant loss to the Canadian horticultural industry, and the costs incurred in the replacement of existing windbreaks would be high. In August 2002, we observed symptoms of bronze leaf disease on approximately 20-year-old tower poplars, ranging in height from 8 to 12 m at a tree nursery and golf course near Carman, Manitoba (49°30'N, 98°0'W). The leaf laminae of affected plants were chocolate brown, and the petioles and veins were yellow to light green. In the nursery windbreak, 70 trees had foliar symptoms on 30 to 80% of the canopy. At the golf course, eight trees had foliar symptoms on approximately 5 to 20% of the canopy. No fruiting structures were visible on leaf or shoot tissue, and no staining of vascular tissues was observed. Attempts to isolate the causal fungus of bronze leaf disease on artificial media have been unsuccessful (2). In October 2002, branches with symptomatic leaves were covered with netting, and the trapped leaves were left to overwinter. In March 2003, symptomatic leaves were brought to the laboratory and surface sterilized in 1% NaOCl for 1 min, rinsed with sterile water, and incubated at 18°C in moist chambers. After 2 weeks, dark brown, beaked, single perithecia that were 150 to 200 μm long × 150 μm wide emerged from the upper and lower leaf surfaces. Asci were fusoid clavate with a conspicuous apical ring and contained 4 or 6 spores. The two-celled, hyaline ascospores varied from 10.5 to 14.5 × 2 to 3 μm, the basal cell shorter than the apical cell. Leaf symptoms and microscopic fungal features matched those of Apioplagiostoma populi (Cash & A.M. Waterman) Barr, the cause of bronze leaf disease (1,2). Voucher specimens have been deposited in the U.S. National Fungus Collections (BPI 843385). To our knowledge, this is the first report of this fungus in western Canada, and the first confirmed report of this pathogen on tower poplar in Canada. References: (1) E. K. Cash and A. M. Waterman. Mycologia 49:756, 1957. (2) J. A. Smith et al. Plant Dis. 86:462, 2002.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it