Remote point-of-gaze estimation requiring a single-point calibration for applications with infants
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a method for remote, non-contact point-of-gaze estimation that tolerates free head movements and requires a simple calibration procedure in which the subject has to fixate only on a single point. This method uses the centers of the pupil and at least two corneal reflections that are estimated from eye images captured by at least two cameras. Experimental results obtained with three adult subjects exhibited RMS point-of-gaze estimation errors ranging from 7 to 12 mm (equivalent to about 0.6 -- 1° of visual angle) for head movements in a volume of about 1 dm3. Preliminary results with two infants demonstrated the ability of a system that requires a single-point calibration procedure to estimate infants' point-of-gaze. The ability to record infants' visual scanning behavior can be used for the study of visual development, the determination of attention allocation and the assessment of visual function in preverbal infants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it