Disability, Professional Unsuitability and the Profession of Social Work: A Case Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The evaluation of student conduct and suitability during professional training is critical to ensuring that the profession is promoting its values, protecting the public, clients and practitioners, and providing good and valuable service. However, a factor such as the presence of a student's mental disability can present significant challenges in this regard. This paper considers the challenges related to students who may be unsuitable for the profession of social work because of a mental disability. In addition we reference human rights laws and their interpretation as they relate to the rights of students with disabilities and consider the application of human rights principles to faculties of social work given their duty to accommodate students with disabilities. We use a case study that involves a practicum student, his placement, his disability, and the breach of ethics that led to him failing the practicum. We illustrate the connection between his disability, the breach of ethics and human rights obligations that apply in this case as well as consider possible resolutions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it