MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070038046 · doi:10.4043/24450-ms

Large Scale Nonlinear Dynamic Simulation of Flexible Risers with Detailed Finite Element Models - Part 1

2013· article· en· W2070038046 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Brasil · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical stress and fatigue analysis
Canadian institutionsIntecsea (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemFinite element methodStructural engineeringBendingEngineeringSoftwareComputer scienceMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Flexible risers are in increasing demand for deeper water applications. Accurate large scale global simulations of flexible risers and prediction of helical armour stresses have become an industry priority. Standard riser dynamic analysis software packages utilize line element models that can not capture the complex three-dimensional behavior of flexible risers. Advanced finite element software can model the complex geometry and multi-layered behavior; however, the computational requirements of these solvers limit the models to just a few meters in length. An advanced methodology that affords very significant computational efficiencies is required to bridge the gap to large scale nonlinear dynamic simulations with detailed finite element models. This paper demonstrates an advanced method of analysis that is capable of incorporating detailed finite element models into large scale fully nonlinear dynamic simulations while maintaining execution speeds of standard riser dynamic analysis software packages. Nonlinear Dynamic Substructuring (NDS) is utilized to efficiently execute a large scale nonlinear dynamic simulation of a 500 meter, 9 inch flexible riser system modeled with multi-layer shell finite element models. It is shown that the simulation captures coupled axial-bending-torsional response of the flexible riser. This complex interaction is due to the coupling of geometrically nonlinear global effects with the local winding/unwinding of the contra-wound helical armour layers. The simulation also models armour layer stick-slip friction behavior modeled via a generalized nonlinear bending hysteresis formulation. This bending hysteresis model couples to the geometrically nonlinear large deformation response of the riser. In addition, NDS affords direct and efficient stress recoveries at any desired riser location/layer from the large scale simulation. This is done via an NDS Stress Transformation Matrix (STM) and will be demonstrated in follow-on paper. Effects such as carcass and zeta layers hoop stress compression due to armour layer windings are captured. Relative to computation times, this large scale NDS simulation of a 500m flexible riser, with the pre-NDS multi-layer finite element element models totaling 48,000,000+ degrees of freedom, was executed on a single core processor and in minutes. Introduction Flexible riser systems are in increased demand for deeper water applications necessitating the requirement for advanced, computationally efficient, large scale simulation methods. Prediction of flexible riser dynamic behavior is significantly complicated by the coupling of the geometrically nonlinear and multi-layer interaction effects. This coupling results in complex three-dimensional behavior which can not be modeled with standard riser global analysis software line element formulation. While advanced finite element analysis software can model the complex geometry and multi-layer interaction, the significant computation times required by the solver, even for very short riser lengths, is incongruent with large scale utilization (Ref 5). Clearly, efficient computation is one of the key challenges to large scale analysis of flexible risers with detailed models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.499
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it