MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070450344 · doi:10.1002/mame.200350002

Sheet‐Molded Polyolefin Natural Fiber Composites for Automotive Applications

2003· article· en· W2070450344 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Materials and Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialFiberPolyolefinIzod impact strength testFlexural strengthNatural fiberUltimate tensile strengthLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The use of natural fibers as reinforcing filler in thermoplastics is a relatively new application and has great potential in replacing glass fiber products in automotive industry. However, most of the research in this area has been focused primarily on flax fiber. In the first part of the work presented here, hemp fiber non‐woven mats are used exclusively in combination with a poly(propylene) matrix to study the mechanical properties of natural fiber mat thermoplastics (NMT) in the absence of binder. Film stacking was used as the method of preparation. The results show that hemp‐based NMT have comparable or even higher strength properties as compared with conventional flax‐based thermoplastics. A value of 63 MPa for the flexural strength is achieved at a fiber content of 64 wt.‐%. The influence of the compression ratio on the mechanical properties and density of NMT is also reported. A definite increase in strength is observed with increasing compression together with a much more uniform density profile. In the second part of this study, a unique combination of random hemp fibers, non‐woven mats and poly(propylene) films was employed in film stacking to evaluate strength properties and economic implications. The same fiber content (64 wt.‐%) was maintained in the final NMT by replacing 78 wt.‐% of the mats by random fibers. Preliminary tests reveal better mechanical properties especially in terms of impact energy, which is 50 to 100% higher, as compared with different mats‐only/poly(propylene) combinations. Further, a net saving of 40% in fiber cost is anticipated by replacing 78% non‐woven mats with an equivalent amount of random fibers. Overall results of this study indicate that hemp‐based NMT are promising candidates in automotive applications where high specific stiffness is required. Tensile Strength of different NMTs and GMT. magnified image Tensile Strength of different NMTs and GMT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.950

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it