Aboriginal peoples in North American and euro‐north American leisure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The intersection of Euro‐North American leisure and recreation with the cultures and practices of Aboriginal peoples in North America has received scant attention in academic literature about leisure. Given the importance of leisure in the modern world, the numerous declarations and propositions that leisure is important to the health and well‐being of Aboriginal peoples in North America, the political interconnections of parks, natural resources and Aboriginal sovereignty and land rights, and the potential for commodification, appropriation, and reproduction of colonialistic and imperialistic forces within Euro‐North American leisure, this oversight is troublesome. In the following discussion, I extend, develop, and add to earlier calls for more research, scholarship, and reflection about the intersection of Aboriginal peoples and Euro‐North American leisure. In addition, I explore issues identified by Indigenous peoples and scholars as relevant to the intersection and research about, by, for, and with Aboriginal peoples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it