MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070782744 · doi:10.1287/trsc.35.2.192.10134

Deliveries in an Inventory/Routing Problem Using Stochastic Dynamic Programming

2001· article· en· W2070782744 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamic programmingProduct (mathematics)Operations researchComputer scienceRouting (electronic design automation)Stochastic programmingMathematical optimizationPoint (geometry)Vehicle routing problemProcess (computing)Operations managementEngineeringMathematicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An industrial gases tanker vehicle visits n customers on a tour, with a possible (n + 1)st customer added at the end. The amount of needed product at each customer is a known random process, typically a Wiener process. The objective is to adjust dynamically the amount of product provided on scene to each customer so as to minimize total expected costs, comprising costs of earliness, lateness, product shortfall, and returning to the depot nonempty. Earliness costs are computed by invocation of an annualized incremental cost argument. Amounts of product delivered to each customer are not known until the driver is on scene at the customer location, at which point the customer is either restocked to capacity or left with some residual empty capacity, the policy determined by stochastic dynamic programming. The methodology has applications beyond industrial gases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it