ROBUSTNESS OF PROCEDURES FOR THE BEHRENS-FISHER PROBLEMS: EXTENSION TO BIVARIATE NORMAL MIXTURES
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the applied sciences, it is often important to be able to compare the mean values of two populations. However, testing a hypothesis can be complex, if the two populations are heteroscedastic and exhibit non-normality in the data. This paper reviews currently available strategies for the multivariate Behrens-Fisher problem. It then carries out Monte Carlo comparisons of selected procedures to assess their robustness when applied to data from normal mixture distributions. The overall conclusion is that Johansen's procedure appears to work best for small sample data both in terms of empirical power and significance level. Johansen's procedure works reasonably well even with mixture data. The simulation also provides researchers with specific guidelines to follow at the early designing and planning stages of the investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it