Rough Terrain Reconstruction for Rover Motion Planning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A two-step approach is presented to generate a 3D navigable terrain model for robots operating in natural and uneven environment. First an unstructured surface is built from a 360 degrees field of view LIDAR scan. Second the reconstructed surface is analyzed and the navigable space is extracted to keep only the safe area as a compressed irregular triangular mesh. The resulting mesh is a compact terrain representation and allows point-robot assumption for further motion planning tasks. The proposed algorithm has been validated using a large database containing 688 LIDAR scans collected on an outdoor rough terrain. The mesh simplification error was evaluated using the approximation of Hausdorff distance. In average, for a compression level of 93.5%, the error was of the order of 0.5 cm. This terrain modeler was deployed on a rover controlled from the International Space Station (ISS) during the Avatar Explore Space Mission carried out by the Canadian Space Agency in 2009.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it