MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071581277 · doi:10.2118/147531-ms

Chemical Process for Improved Oil Recovery From Bakken Shale

2011· article· en· W2071581277 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Unconventional Resources Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDolostoneOil shaleSiltstoneGeologyPetroleum engineeringHydraulic fracturingPetroleum reservoirShale oilDevonianTight oilPetroleumGeochemistryDrillingUnconventional oilCarbonateSedimentary rockDirectional drillingCarbonate rockStructural basinPaleontologyFacies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract There is a new chemical improved oil recovery (IOR) process for Bakken reservoirs. In this concept a custom surfactant agent may be incorporated into standard hydraulic fracturing treatments for the Bakken to increase oil recovery. These are reservoirs from the Late Devonian to Early Mississippian age occupying about 200,000 square miles (520,000 km2) of the subsurface of the Williston Basin, covering parts of Montana, North Dakota, and Saskatchewan. The rock formation consists of three members: Lower shale, Middle dolostone/siltstone, and Upper shale. The shales were deposited in relatively deep marine conditions, and the dolostone/siltstone was deposited as a coastal carbonate during a time of shallower water. The Middle member is the principal oil reservoir, roughly two miles (3.2 km) below the surface. Both the Lower and Upper members are organic-rich marine shales. The oil in place in the Bakken shale play is very large, with an April 2008 USGS report estimating the amount of technically recoverable oil in the Bakken Formation at 3.0 to 4.3 billion barrels. Production from the Bakken has been limited in the past, but now has become a very active area of development with the widespread advent of drilling horizontal wells and large-volume hydraulic fracturing treatments. One key to the economic production rates of oil from these formations is to create an extensive well-connected fracture system. Laboratory experiments demonstrate that specialized surfactant formulations will interact with this mixed- to oil-wet low permeability Middle member to produce more oil. Specifically, including such a surfactant chemical formulation in an aqueous phase (e.g. hydraulic fracturing fluids) will promote the spontaneous imbibition of this fluid into the tight matrix and microfractures containing high oil saturation. This promotes expulsion of oil otherwise trapped to migrate into the fracture system and then be produced into the wellbore. Thus including an appropriate surfactant in frac fluids or in other aqueous-based treatment fluids can produce additional oil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it