MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071589114 · doi:10.1109/hldvt.2006.319966

Efficient Automata-Based Assertion-Checker Synthesis of PSL Properties

2006· article· en· W2071589114 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFormal Methods in Verification
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAssertionAutomatonEmulationModular designProgramming languageDebuggingHardware emulationSet (abstract data type)Theoretical computer scienceSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automata-based methods for generating PSL hardware assertion checkers were primarily considered for use with temporal sequences, as opposed to full-scale properties. We present a technique for automata-based checker generation of PSL properties for dynamic verification. A full automata-based approach allows an entire assertion to be represented by a single automaton, hence allowing optimizations which can not be done in a modular approach where sub-circuits are created only for individual operators. For this purpose, automata algorithms are developed for the base cases, and a complete set of rewrite rules is developed and applied for all other operators. We show that the generated checkers are resource-efficient for use in hardware emulation, simulation acceleration and silicon debug

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.395

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it