MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071764275 · doi:10.1115/1.4005700

An Experimental Investigation of HCCI Combustion Stability Using n-Heptane

2012· article· en· W2071764275 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Energy Resources Technology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersNatural Resources CanadaCovis Pharma
KeywordsHomogeneous charge compression ignitionCombustionMaterials scienceAutomotive engineeringIgnition systemThermodynamicsMechanicsChemistryEnvironmental scienceCombustion chamberPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The combustion stability of a single-cylinder homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) engine operated with n-heptane was experimentally investigated over a range of engine speeds (N), intake temperatures and pressures, compression ratios (CR), air/fuel ratios (AFR), and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) rates. These parameters were varied to alter the combustion phasing from an overly advanced condition where engine knock occurred to an overly retarded condition where incomplete combustion was observed with excessive emissions of carbon monoxide (CO) and unburned hydrocarbons (UHC). The combustion stability was quantified by the coefficients of variation in indicated mean effective pressure (COVimep) and peak cylinder pressure (COVPmax). Cycle-to-cycle variations in the HCCI combustion behavior of this engine were shown to depend strongly on the combustion phasing, defined in this study as the crank angle position where 50% of the energy was released (CA50). In general, combustion instability increased significantly when the combustion phasing was overly retarded. The combustion phasing was limited to conditions where the COVimep was 5% or less as engine operation became difficult to control beyond this point. Based on the experimental data, the combustion phasing limit was approximately a linear function of the amount of fuel inducted in each cycle. Stable HCCI combustion could be obtained with progressively retarded combustion phasing as the fuel flow rate increased. In comparison, stable HCCI combustion was only obtained under very advanced combustion phasing for low load operating conditions. Investigation of the experimental data reveals that the cyclic variations in HCCI combustion were due to cycle-to-cycle variations in total heat release (THR). The combustion completeness of the previous cycle affected the in-cylinder bulk mixture conditions and resultant heat release process of the following engine cycle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it