MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2071808091 · doi:10.4043/23733-ms

Movement Due to Heave and Thaw Settlement of a Full-Scale Test Chilled Gas Pipeline Constructed in Fairbanks Alaska

2012· article· en· W2071808091 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOTC Arctic Technology Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostFrost heavingGeologySettlement (finance)OverburdenGeotechnical engineeringFrost (temperature)Environmental scienceGeomorphologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper the authors report the heave and thaw settlement properties ofa test chilled gas pipeline. A full-scale field experiment of the chilled gaspipeline system was conducted in Fairbanks Alaska from 1999 to 2005. The lengthof the test pipeline was 105m and the diameter was 0.9m. The circulated chilledair was -10 °C. One-third of the pipeline was buried in permafrostand the rest of it was placed in non-permafrost. At the end of July 2003, circulation of the chilled air ceased, however, monitoring of the thawsettlement properties of the test pipeline continued until the middle of April,2005. The results obtained include:As the frost-bulb around the pipeline innon-permafrost section formed, the test pipeline in the non-permafrost sectionmoved upward, resulting in bending of the pipeline at the boundary.Insummers, overburden frozen ground of the pipeline became thinner due to thedevelopment of active layer above. The pipeline buried in permafrost sectionmoved upward abruptly, fracturing the thinning overburden frozen ground.Thephenomenon mentionedoccurred successive summer, and the pipeline uplift inpermafrost section continued in summers.In relation withthe upwardmovement in non-permafrost section was confirmed by frost heaving of the pipefoundation.Settlement of the test pipeline was also confirmed by thawsettlement of the foundation.During the thawing process, the temperature ofthe thawing frost bulb became 0 °C at first and then thawed rapidlyin summer together with the development of active layer. As a result, settlement of the pipeline happened rapidly in summer. Introduction In the existing natural gas production field in permafrost regions such asWest Siberia, gas pipelines float in water or are exposed in ditchs as shown inthe photos of Fig. 1. However the gas pressure at the present time has droppedconsiderably comparing to the one in the initial production days. This pressuredrop enables the damaged pipeline system to survive. However, those initiallyburied gas pipelines are now mostly exposed and lost the structural stabilitiesand security reliability. As for the natural gas pipeline installation in permafrost regions, theburied system has been recommended for security reasons. In order to preventthawing of the permafrost shown in Fig. 1, the gas must be chilled fortransportation in permafrost regions. On the other hand, even with the chilledgas pipeline system, miner problems may still happen in limited sections of thepipeline where frost heave damage occurs when the pipeline freezessurrounding soils in non-permafrost section (Talik). Two primary chilled pipeline test experiments are discussed in theliterature: the Calgary Frost Heave Facility and the Caen, France experiment. Athird chilled pipeline experiment was conducted at the Fairbanks Frost HeaveFacility, but the data remains unavailable to the public. The Caen, France chilled pipeline experiment is well documented in public literature byGeotechnical Science Laboratories (1983, 1986a, 1986b, 1988) and Dallimore andWilliams (1985). The purposes of the Caen experiment were toinvestigate differential heave resulting from the abrupt transitionbetween two different lithologic soils (Caen silt and SNEC sand) with varyingfrost susceptibilities and the associated stresses incurred by the pipeline andthe soil mass. Abrupt lithologic transition zones are common in thenatural environment such as the transition between active fluvial graveldeposits and silt overbanks deposits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it