MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072008540 · doi:10.2118/150706-ms

An Integrated Technology Development Plan for Solvent-based Recovery of Heavy Oil

2011· article· en· W2072008540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsImperial Oil (Canada)
FundersGovernment of Alberta
KeywordsScope (computer science)Enhanced oil recoveryProcess (computing)Resource recoveryResource (disambiguation)Process engineeringScale (ratio)Computer scienceSystems engineeringSolventEngineeringWaste managementChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract ExxonMobil and its Canadian affiliate Imperial Oil Resources are pursuing an integrated research program targeted at developing the next generation of heavy oil recovery processes which utilize hydrocarbon solvents as a mobilizing agent. The key benefits of solvent-based processes are improved environmental performance, improved economics and recovery of resource that is impractical with thermal processes. The integrated research program encompasses fundamental laboratory work, analytical modeling, advanced numerical modeling, scaled physical modeling in the laboratory, a solvent-only pilot which is in the design phase, an operating solvent-assisted SAGD pilot and a first commercial scale application of a solvent-assisted cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) process known as Liquid Addition for Steam Enhanced Recovery (LASER). This paper provides a systematic review of the scope, technical challenges, benefits and successes of research efforts in each of the areas cited above. In general, the results of laboratory modeling and simulation studies are strongly supportive of the potential success of solvent-assisted and solvent-based recovery processes. Reliably demonstrating solvent recovery processes at the field scale remains a key challenge that can only be addressed through well designed field pilot programs and enhanced reservoir surveillance programs for commercial scale applications. These challenges are highlighted in the paper utilizing specific examples from the integrated research program. In conclusion, there are some very significant technical challenges that need to be addressed before solvent-assisted and solvent-based heavy oil recovery processes will be broadly commercialized. Nonetheless, consideration of the results across the full breadth of ExxonMobil's integrated technology program provides strong support that a new generation of solvent recovery processes will emerge as an economically competitive option for heavy oil recovery with significant environmental benefits relative to today's thermal recovery processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it