An Integrated Technology Development Plan for Solvent-based Recovery of Heavy Oil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract ExxonMobil and its Canadian affiliate Imperial Oil Resources are pursuing an integrated research program targeted at developing the next generation of heavy oil recovery processes which utilize hydrocarbon solvents as a mobilizing agent. The key benefits of solvent-based processes are improved environmental performance, improved economics and recovery of resource that is impractical with thermal processes. The integrated research program encompasses fundamental laboratory work, analytical modeling, advanced numerical modeling, scaled physical modeling in the laboratory, a solvent-only pilot which is in the design phase, an operating solvent-assisted SAGD pilot and a first commercial scale application of a solvent-assisted cyclic steam stimulation (CSS) process known as Liquid Addition for Steam Enhanced Recovery (LASER). This paper provides a systematic review of the scope, technical challenges, benefits and successes of research efforts in each of the areas cited above. In general, the results of laboratory modeling and simulation studies are strongly supportive of the potential success of solvent-assisted and solvent-based recovery processes. Reliably demonstrating solvent recovery processes at the field scale remains a key challenge that can only be addressed through well designed field pilot programs and enhanced reservoir surveillance programs for commercial scale applications. These challenges are highlighted in the paper utilizing specific examples from the integrated research program. In conclusion, there are some very significant technical challenges that need to be addressed before solvent-assisted and solvent-based heavy oil recovery processes will be broadly commercialized. Nonetheless, consideration of the results across the full breadth of ExxonMobil's integrated technology program provides strong support that a new generation of solvent recovery processes will emerge as an economically competitive option for heavy oil recovery with significant environmental benefits relative to today's thermal recovery processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".