Effects of curing temperature on moisture distribution, drying and water absorption in self-compacting concrete
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Steam curing is normally used in the precast industry to increase the rate of strength development with the aim of reducing the cycle time and thereby increasing productivity. However, there is concern about the durability of steam cured concrete elements, which is mainly determined by the quality of the cover concrete. In an effort to evaluate the effectiveness of curing at 50°C for several hours in producing durable concrete, compared to moist curing at 23 and 38°C for seven days, the moisture distribution of drying self-compacting concrete containing 30% fly ash, as well as the moisture distribution in water uptake experiments were studied using magnetic resonance imaging. The results of drying indicated an increased moisture loss in the cover concrete when the specimens were cured at 50°C. The water uptake experiments showed a higher penetration of the water front, higher sorptivity, and higher moisture diffusivity of concrete cured at 50°C compared to concrete which was moist cured at 38°C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it