MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072076940 · doi:10.4310/cms.2015.v13.n4.a6

Ring patterns and their bifurcations in a nonlocal model of biological swarms

2015· article· en· W2072076940 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Mathematical Sciences · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersDivision of Emerging Frontiers in Research and InnovationDivision of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRing (chemistry)BifurcationPhysicsStatistical physicsClassical mechanicsMechanicsMathematicsNonlinear systemQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we study the pattern formation of a kinematic aggregation model for biological swarming in two dimensions. The swarm is represented by particles and the dynamics are driven by a gradient flow of a non-local interaction potential which has a local repulsion long range attraction structure. We review and expand upon recent developments of this class of problems as well as present new results. As in previous work, we leverage a co-dimension one formulation of the continuum gradient flow to characterize the stability of ring solutions for general interaction kernels. In the regime of long-wave instability we show that the resulting ground state is a low mode bifurcation away from the ring and use weakly nonlinear analysis to provide conditions for when this bifurcation is a pitchfork. In the regime of short-wave instabilities we show that the rings break up into fully 2D ground states in the large particle limit. We analyze the dependence of the stability of a ring on the number of particles and provide examples of complex multi-ring bifurcation behavior as the number of particles increases. We are also able to provide a solution for the "designer potential" problem in 2D. Finally, we characterize the stability of the rotating rings in the second order kinetic swarming model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.294
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.390
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.021 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it