MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2072410687 · doi:10.1002/jrs.1042

Solvent effects on sunscreen active ingredients using Raman spectroscopy

2003· article· en· W2072410687 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Raman Spectroscopy · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSkin Protection and Aging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaman spectroscopyPolarizabilitySolventChemistryWavenumberSolvent effectsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Resonance Raman spectroscopyAbsorption (acoustics)Hydrogen bondPhotochemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We present Raman spectra of five sunscreen active ingredients in 10 solvents. Shifts in the UV absorption maxima and the CO Raman mode wavenumber are observed for some of the sunscreens as a function of solvent. Correlations between the observed wavenumber shifts and solvent properties indicate that hydrogen bonding is a key interaction between sunscreen active ingredients and solvent. Interestingly, the relative Raman intensities are also sensitive to the hydrogen‐bonding and polarizability properties of the solvent, reflecting differential stabilization of the sunscreen's resonance structures. These results suggest an ‘expanded polarizability’ view of the solvent's effect on the solute. The observed wavenumber and relative intensity changes were also utilized to identify the active agents present in commercial sunscreen preparations from their in situ Raman spectra. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it