Tests for non‐correlation of two cointegrated ARMA time series
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In multivariate time series modelling, we are often led to investigate the existence of a relationship between two time series. Here, we generalize the procedure proposed by Haugh (1976 ) and extended by El Himdi and Roy (1997 ) for multivariate stationary ARMA time series to the case of cointegrated (or partially nonstationary) ARMA series. The main contribution consists in showing that, in the case of two uncorrelated cointegrated time series, an arbitrary vector of residual cross‐correlation matrices asymptotically follows the same distribution as the corresponding vector of cross‐correlation matrices between the two innovation series. The estimation method from which the residuals are obtained can be the conditional maximum likelihood method as discussed in Yap and Reinsel (1995 ) or some other which has the same convergence rate. From this result, it follows that the considered test statistics, which are based on residual cross‐correlation matrices, asymptotically follow χ 2 distributions. The finite sample properties, under the null hypothesis, of the test statistics are studied by simulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it