Westalgie? Nostalgia for the "Old" Federal Republic in Recent German Prose
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In a book review in Der Spiegel in 2001, Thomas Brussig, author of Am kurzeren Ende der Sonnenallee (1999) and with this one of the most prominent literary exponents of the preoccupation with the GDR experience popularly known as Ostalgie, pointed to a curious dearth of Western writers producing interesting narra tives about the Federal Republic of Germany before 1990. Eines der anmasendsten Vorurteile uber die junge deutsche Gegenwartsliteratur lautet, Brussig began his discussion, die interessantere Literatur im Osten geschrieben wurde und dass das auch so sein musse, weil Untergang, Umbruch und Neubeginn sowie die Erfahrung und Verarbeitung des Realsozialismus Stoff in Hulle und Fulle bieten. He continued by distinguishing a selfreflexive, experimental, high-art conception of literature from more accessible, experience-based, and popular forms of literary expression:
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".