MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073036161 · doi:10.1159/000015668

Spontaneous frequencies of aneuploid and diploid sperm in 10 normal Chinese men: assessed by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization

2000· article· en· W2073036161 on OpenAlexaffabout
Qinghua Shi, Renée H. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueCytogenetic and Genome Research · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpermBiologyFluorescence in situ hybridizationPloidySemenChromosomeAneuploidyMeiosisFish <Actinopterygii>GeneticsAndrologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many studies have been published establishing the background frequencies of disomic and diploid sperm in normal men by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis, with highly significant variance among the reports. Besides interdonor heterogeneity and differences in the experimental protocols used, the question of inherent differences in chromosome malsegregation and meiotic arrest among different geographic and ethnic groups of donors has been raised. In this study, multicolor FISH analysis was carried out on semen samples from 10 nonsmoking, nondrinking Chinese men from the People's Republic of China. The results were compared to FISH data on 10 nonsmoking, nondrinking Canadians under the same experimental conditions, in the same laboratory. A total of 200,497 sperm was scored in the Chinese donors and compared to 202,320 sperm from Canadian donors. Approximately 10,000 sperm per chromosome probe per donor were analyzed. The mean hybridization efficiency was 99.99%. The frequencies of X-bearing and Y-bearing sperm were not significantly different from the expected 50% for each individual and for the combined data from all donors (49.73% vs. 49.46%, P = 0.3946). The mean disomy frequencies (range) were 0.07% (0.02%-0.12%) for chromosome 13, 0.18% (0.09%-0.19%) for chromosome 21, 0.05% (0. 01%-0.09%) for 24,XX, 0.02% (0.01%-0.06%) for 24,YY, and 0.29% (0. 13%-0.49%) for 24,XY. The mean diploidy frequency (range) was 0.38% (0.22%-0.73%) for 13-21 hybridizations and 0.32% (0.07%-0.70%) for XY hybridizations. Highly significant interdonor heterogeneity was found for diploidy (P = 0.0000) and for XY disomy (P = 0.0011), but no age effect was observed in any category of disomic or diploid sperm. The data reported here show no marked differences in disomy and diploidy frequencies between the mainland Chinese and Canadian groups, if donor heterogeneity is taken into account.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations106
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCytogenetic and Genome ResearchSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207