MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073173876 · doi:10.2514/2.6045

Effect of Transient Gasdynamic Processes on the Impulse of Pulse Detonation Engines

2002· article· en· W2073173876 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Propulsion and Power · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDetonationImpulse (physics)Transient (computer programming)MechanicsSpecific impulseMaterials scienceAerospace engineeringPulse (music)Deflagration to detonation transitionAcousticsPropulsionExplosive materialPhysicsEngineeringClassical mechanicsComputer scienceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction I N a pulse detonation engine (PDE), thrust results from the expansion of the high-pressureand temperature products of a detonation. Much of the effort in PDE development has been focused on the rapid initiation of detonation to achieve detonation in a distance compatible with the dimensions of an engine. The question of whether the impulse generated depends on different gasdynamic processes, such as direct initiation, de agration to detonation transition (DDT), or constant volume explosion, becomes a valid one. In the present study, the impulse produced by a single-cycle hydrogen–oxygen PDE is experimentally investigated.The goal is to determine the effect of transient gasdynamic processes on impulse. The impulse producedby direct initiation is compared to that producedby DDT for two different initiation locations,at the thrust wall and at the open end. The equivalence ratio is varied to control the run-up distance (RUD). The impulse is measured in two ways: the ballistic pendulum method and the integration of the end wall (thrust wall) pressure. The former, the ballistic pendulum method, was Ž rst applied to measuring the impulse generated by a detonation by Nicholls et al. and has recently been used by Cooper et al. and Daniau et al. to measure the effect of obstacles and nozzles on the impulse generated by a single detonation pulse. Harris et al. also used a ballistic pendulum to study the effect of nitrogen dilution and compared the impulse for the cases of direct initiation and DDT initiated from the closed end of the tube. In the ballistic pendulum technique, the amplitude of swing of a pendulum-mounted PDE provides a direct measurement of the total integrated thrust. The latter technique, integrating the end wall pressure, is more typically used in PDE experiments, but will only produce an accurate measurement of impulse if friction and other momentum losses are negligible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it