MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073218447 · doi:10.1002/ddr.10318

Proteinase‐activated receptors (PARs) and the kidney

2003· article· en· W2073218447 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrug Development Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKidneyRenal functionPathophysiologyReceptorBiologyInternal medicineEndocrinologyPathologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract It has been discovered that the kidney is an organ that is particularly rich in proteinase‐activated receptor‐2 (PAR 2 ) and that also expresses PARs 1 and 4. Notwithstanding this fact, the potential physiologic role that PARs play in regulating renal function is largely unknown. This article summarizes much about what is known in terms of the expression of mRNA for PARs 1, 2 and 4 in the kidney, the cellular distribution of PARs 1 and 2, and the renal vascular actions of PARs 1, 2, and 4. The ability of PARs 1 and 2 to exert a bidirectional action on renal perfusion flow and glomerular filtration rate and the wide distribution of PARs 1 and 2 in both vascular and epithelial elements of the kidney imply not only that the PARs may play an important pathophysiologic role in the kidney, but that the individual PARs may each play distinct roles in this regard. Drug Dev. Res. 60:36–42, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.786

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it