MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073403698 · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2012.6214380

Accelerated genetic algorithm for bandwidth allocation in view of EMI for wireless healthcare

2012· article· en· W2073403698 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMinistère du Développement Économique, de l’Innovation et de l’Exportation
KeywordsComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)WirelessBandwidth allocationGenetic algorithmQuality of serviceComputationWireless networkComputer networkAlgorithmDynamic bandwidth allocationTelecommunicationsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To enhance the capacity of patients supported by wireless in-hospital monitoring systems, a bandwidth allocation scheme for the transmission of medical data in the wireless local area network (WLAN) is proposed. The problem of bandwidth allocation, subject to limited wireless bandwidth, quality of service (QoS) requirements of medical data transmission, as well as electromagnetic interference, is modeled as a non-polynomial (NP) optimization problem. To save the computation time of this NP problem, we propose an accelerated genetic algorithm by dynamically adjusting both the inheritance probability and the mutation probability, and then compare it with other off-the-shelf genetic algorithms. Our study shows that our proposed algorithm can save computation time and attain the same result of bandwidth allocation in comparison with other algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Body Area NetworksFrench-language works237,207