Detection of Buildings in Multispectral Very High Spatial Resolution Images Using the Percentage Occupancy Hit-or-Miss Transform
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The morphological hit-or-miss transform (HMT) was found to be efficient for the detection of buildings in panchromatic bands of very high spatial resolution images. The use of multispectral information was judged to be necessary to improve the results. The application of morphological operators to multispectral images is problematic, as no universal strategy for ordering the multivalued pixels of these images has been widely adopted. In this paper, we propose a new method to detect building locations based on a recently developed concept for the HMT to handle noise, called percentage occupancy HMT (POHMT). The parameters for the POHMT were defined with the aid of the top-hat by reconstruction transformation. To eliminate irrelevant locations, we applied a vegetation mask and verified locations by their proximity to shadows. The novelty of the method consists in the proposed vector-based strategy that allows for the application of the POHMT to multispectral images in order to detect building locations. Moreover, an original technique to automatically define the parameters for the POHMT was proposed. The method was tested on subsets from a pan-sharpened Ikonos image and from raw GeoEye and WorldView-2 images. The experimental results are promising.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".