MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2073667548 · doi:10.1016/j.entcs.2009.12.029

Formal Specification of Correlation in WS Orchestrations Using BP-calculus

2009· article· en· W2073667548 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWeb serviceProcess calculusBusiness Process Execution LanguageOrchestrationProgramming languageUniquenessSemantics (computer science)CorrelationFunction (biology)Theoretical computer scienceService-oriented architectureMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Correlation is an important mechanism used in orchestration languages for Web Services. It expresses means by which many instances of the same service can be carried on at the same time. In this paper we extend the BP-calculus, a language based on the π-calculus and dedicated to the specification of web service orchestrations, with a message algebra, a mechanism of function evaluation and a mechanism of correlation. The mechanism of function evaluation allows message handling while the mechanism of correlation guarantees uniqueness of service instances by preventing reception of messages inducing the same assignments of a correlation set. We also show how it can be used to express the semantics of the BPEL constructs coping with correlation. As an illustration of the usefulness of this process algebraic framework, we terminate with the presentation of a motivating example, the Trade Market example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it