MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Language in the Confessions of Augustine. By Philip Burton

2009· article· en· W2073806381 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Heythrop Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAugustinian Studies and Theology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pp. ix, 198 , New York , Oxford University Press , 2007 , $36.00 . Philip Burton has written a thoroughly researched book that is sure to impress any reader of Augustine who appreciates both the nuances of language and the subtlety of argument weaved within Augustine's writings. In this book Burton insightfully illustrates Augustine's use of language and attitude towards it throughout the Confessions by way of providing a thorough examination of the linguistic choices that Augustine makes throughout the text. While this book can be appreciated by many who enjoy reading Augustine's Confessions, the specificity of the material covered in this book such as the extensive references to the Latin and the presumed knowledge of the classical literary canon, means that this piece of scholarship is clearly intended for those with a background either in classics or in early Christian studies. Burton's book is divided into seven chapters, which includes the epilogue, and each chapter addresses a specific theme on Augustine's use of language. In Chapter 1 Burton continually reveals instances in the Confessions where Augustine cites biblical passages as a way to demonstrate that language, used rightly, is a gift from God that partakes in the beauty of an orderly creation. On this topic, Burton makes some astute observations on Augustine's use of the word sermo as double-edged; like the vain speech of the Manichees, language can be treated as an end in itself, but used rightly language is a means to expressing truth. The difference between these two extremes hinges on the use of language and the voluntas of the reader. In Chapter 2 Burton discusses Augustine's view of comedy by examining the language of the theatre in the Confessions. Reading the Confessions against classical accounts of comedy and narrative, Burton argues that Augustine uses comic language and scenarios, notably, the scene of the student and the axe (Book VI, Section IX), as an alterative form of comedy. While cautiously aware of the seductive pleasure of the theatre, Augustine's alternative form of comedy in the Confessions illustrates ones recognition (cognitio) of misfortune and as a corollary of such misfortune ones eventual awareness and turn (conversio) towards God. Chapter 3 which examines Augustine's selective use of Greek and Latin words when writing on the seven liberal arts is a very informative but dense chapter. The spectrum in which Burton examines Augustine's choice of language on this subject is divided between an ‘ornamental’ use of Greek, that is, when the Greek is not necessary, and a ‘functional’ use of Greek, namely, when it is impossible to discuss the topic without using the Greek. One example of many in this chapter may suffice to enforce Burton's argument in this chapter: Augustine's use of artes instead of dialectica. The Augustine of the Confessions, argues Burton, is one that is less optimistic about the Christianization of the arts. Augustine's pessimism on the role of the arts is evidenced in his preference for the word artes instead of dialectica because the former word enables him to link dialectic with specific Biblical passages as a way to support his belief in the ultimate authority (auctoritas) of Scripture. The title of Chapter 4, ‘Talking Books,’ builds on the insights of scholars like Stock and O'Donnell along with the current discussion surrounding the polarity between the spoken vs. the written word. According to Burton, Augustine collapses the rigid distinction between the oral and literate and argues instead for a dialogical approach to reading: books are a medium for debate rather than objects d'art and to illustrate his point Burton turns to the story of Ponticianus in Book VIII. This story for Burton is representative of Augustine's belief on the delicate counterpoint between the written and the spoken word. Turning to Augustine's use of biblical idioms in Chapter 5, Burton carries the reader through Augustine's many references to the biblical custom of speech (consuetudo). Again, Burton provides many examples of Augustine's subtle use of non-idiomatic plurals and unusual Greek lexical items which allows him to ‘signal a switch into biblical quotations, or a generally biblical register’ (p. 131). The final chapter covers Augustine's references to the paralinguistic activities such as singing, weeping, groaning, and laughter in the Confessions. As a thinker for whom the Psalms had such a prominent place in his thought, Augustine's comments on singing in the Confessions suggest that he preferred to internalize and spiritualize the act of singing. This section on singing will hopefully prove to be invaluable for research on Augustine's Enarrationes in Psalmos, a text which has not received the scholarly attention it deserves. Another section in this chapter that deserves mention is Burton's section on laughter as a paralinguistic activity. Augustine's treatment of laughter in the Confessions, writes Burton, ‘may best be understood in terms of the antithesis between benign, edifying laughter and its malign counterpart’ (p. 167). While this view of laughter was certainly not shared by Christian contemporaries of his time, the references to Augustine's positive appraisal of laughter throughout the Confessions demonstrates that the ascetic rejection of laughter is far from his mind and that the overarching concern of Augustine resides in the use or aim of amusement. Burton's epilogue concludes by noting the importance of the fractured will (voluntas) of readers/writers to Augustine's view on language. One noteworthy comment made here notes the parallels in the Confessions between the acquisition of language in infancy to the development of form out of formlessness in the Genesis creation narrative. Burton notes that Augustine unambiguously makes clear that the pre-linguistic stage of infants, in particular, their ‘ugly noise’ (informis vox), parallels the opening verses of Genesis, a subject that consumes the last three Books in the Confessions, when creation was without form (sine specie et informis). As one acquires language and enrols in a particular social bond as the inevitable result of learning language one ultimately needs to decipher, much like one needs to decipher the movement of the creation narrative, whether language leads to God or for Augustine the feigned belief in self-sufficiency. Overall, this book is a must read for those who wish to gain a deeper and richer appreciation Augustine's Confessions. While Burton certainly mentions the importance of the opening chapters of Genesis in Augustine's Confessions one criticism would be that a more systematic analysis on this subject was needed. Nonetheless, Burton's attentive reading of Augustine's use of language in the Confessions will most certainly prove to be helpful to anyone with a vested interest in the enduring legacy of Augustine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it