MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074123560 · doi:10.1139/l03-106

Dynamic modeling and behavior of the Confederation Bridge

2004· article· en· W2074123560 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPublic Works and Government Services CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsStructural engineeringServiceability (structure)PierFinite element methodVibrationEngineeringBridge (graph theory)Box girderPrestressed concreteRigid frameGirderFrame (networking)Mechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Confederation Bridge is the world longest spanned prestressed concrete box girder bridge standing in salt water. This bridge is subjected to severe dynamic loads, such as transverse loads and vibrations, induced by strong winds and stormy sea waves, destructive seismic loads from possible ground shaking, and impact loads from heavy vehicles and huge ice floe. Therefore, the dynamic behavior of the bridge is a very important factor affecting its safety and serviceability. In the present study, a three-dimensional (3-D) model using shell elements is developed to investigate the free vibration behavior of one repetitive unit, while a frame model using 3-D beam elements is employed to simulate dynamic responses of two repetitive units with a drop-in span. The effects of nonstructural mass, pier–water interaction and foundation flexibility on free vibration behavior are also studied by means of the frame model. The results are representative for the entire bridge because of the repetitiveness in the bridge configuration. Further, field data from pull tests are used to calibrate the finite element models. Computer simulation of the pull test using the calibrated frame model correlates reasonably well with the field data.Key words: Confederation Bridge, numerical modeling, finite element model, model calibration, pull test, computer simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it