Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The risk of thermal fatigue, and the resulting pressure boundary failures, have resulted in a significant amount of research in the Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) and Boiling Water Reactor (BWR) communities in the past two decades. Thermal stresses arising from thermal stratification phenomena are typically not taken into account in design calculations. Because various forms of thermal fatigue events occurred in safety-related piping, non-design basis thermal fatigue has been the subject of a number of U.S. NRC bulletins that led to a significant amount of research by the nuclear industry. This paper discusses the relevance of known thermal fatigue mechanisms to the CANDU® design (a pressurized heavy water reactor), and thermal fatigue operational experience in CANDU plants. These mechanisms are various forms of thermal stratification phenomena, turbulence penetration and large-scale temperature oscillations in mixing fluid streams.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it