MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074502566 · doi:10.1002/mren.200600004

Dynamic Monte Carlo Simulation of ATRP with Bifunctional Initiators

2007· article· en· W2074502566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Reaction Engineering · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBifunctionalMonte Carlo methodDispersityPolymerizationMonomerKinetic Monte CarloMaterials scienceDynamic simulationChemistryPolymer chemistryComputer sciencePolymerSimulationMathematicsOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A dynamic Monte Carlo model was developed to simulate ATRP with bifunctional initiators in a batch reactor. Model probabilities were calculated from polymerization kinetic parameters and reactor conditions. The model was used to predict monomer conversion, average molecular weight, polydispersity and the complete CLD as a function of polymerization time. The Monte Carlo model was compared with simulation results from a mathematical model that uses population balances and the method of moments. We also compared polymerizations with monofunctional and bifunctional initiators to illustrate some of the advantages of using bifunctional initiators in ATRP. In addition, we used the model to investigate the effect of the control volume and several polymerization conditions on simulation time, monomer conversion, molecular weight averages and CLD. Our results indicate that computational times can be reduced without sacrificing the quality of the results if we run several simulations with small control volumes rather than one single simulation with a large control volume. magnified image

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it