MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074582355 · doi:10.1007/s100240010108

Telomerase Activity as a Prognostic Factor in Neuroblastomas

2001· article· en· W2074582355 on OpenAlexaff
Catherine Streutker, Paul S. Thorner, N. Fabricius, Sheila Weitzman, Maria Zieleńska

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric and Developmental Pathology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelomeraseNeuroblastomaChemotherapyBiologyTrk receptorInternal medicineOncologyStage (stratigraphy)Tumor progressionCancer researchPathologyMedicineCancerReceptorCell cultureNerve growth factorGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor of early childhood. This tumor demonstrates significant heterogeneity with respect to pathologic, genetic, and clinical features. The outcome varies from spontaneous regression or maturation to rapid progression, despite aggressive therapy. Prognostic factors have been found that identify those tumors which have a high probability of aggressive behavior; these factors include unfavorable histology, MYCN copy number, deletions of the short arm of chromosome 1, DNA content, and TRK-A (high-affinity receptor protein for nerve growth factor) expression. Recent studies have suggested that high levels of telomerase activity also correlate with poor clinical outcome. We investigated this relationship in 40 patients with untreated neuroblastoma, using a PCR-ELISA assay for telomerase activity. In these patients, 23 tumors had no or minimal telomerase activity whereas 15 had high levels of activity. In two tumors, telomerase activity was not assessable. There was significant correlation between the telomerase activity and MYCN copy number, 1p deletions, and TRK-A expression, as well as patient age, clinical stage, and outcome. The histological classification of the tumors was not significantly different between the two groups, being predominantly unfavorable by the Shimada classification. In addition, for 17 patients tumor tissue was assessed for telomerase activity post-chemotherapy. In those cases where the tumor was negative for telomerase activity before and after chemotherapy, the patients uniformly did well. In cases where the tumor was positive before and negative or weakly positive after treatment, two of the seven patients did well clinically. However, in cases that were positive after chemotherapy, all had recurrence or died. In conclusion, telomerase activity appears to be a prognostic factor for neuroblastomas. In addition, assessment of tumors post-chemotherapy may be a further indicator of clinical outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric and Developmental PathologySame topicTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceFrench-language works237,207