MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074582355 · doi:10.1007/s100240010108

Telomerase Activity as a Prognostic Factor in Neuroblastomas

2001· article· en· W2074582355 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric and Developmental Pathology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelomeraseNeuroblastomaChemotherapyBiologyTrk receptorInternal medicineOncologyStage (stratigraphy)Tumor progressionCancer researchPathologyMedicineCancerReceptorCell cultureNerve growth factorGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuroblastoma is the most common extracranial solid tumor of early childhood. This tumor demonstrates significant heterogeneity with respect to pathologic, genetic, and clinical features. The outcome varies from spontaneous regression or maturation to rapid progression, despite aggressive therapy. Prognostic factors have been found that identify those tumors which have a high probability of aggressive behavior; these factors include unfavorable histology, MYCN copy number, deletions of the short arm of chromosome 1, DNA content, and TRK-A (high-affinity receptor protein for nerve growth factor) expression. Recent studies have suggested that high levels of telomerase activity also correlate with poor clinical outcome. We investigated this relationship in 40 patients with untreated neuroblastoma, using a PCR-ELISA assay for telomerase activity. In these patients, 23 tumors had no or minimal telomerase activity whereas 15 had high levels of activity. In two tumors, telomerase activity was not assessable. There was significant correlation between the telomerase activity and MYCN copy number, 1p deletions, and TRK-A expression, as well as patient age, clinical stage, and outcome. The histological classification of the tumors was not significantly different between the two groups, being predominantly unfavorable by the Shimada classification. In addition, for 17 patients tumor tissue was assessed for telomerase activity post-chemotherapy. In those cases where the tumor was negative for telomerase activity before and after chemotherapy, the patients uniformly did well. In cases where the tumor was positive before and negative or weakly positive after treatment, two of the seven patients did well clinically. However, in cases that were positive after chemotherapy, all had recurrence or died. In conclusion, telomerase activity appears to be a prognostic factor for neuroblastomas. In addition, assessment of tumors post-chemotherapy may be a further indicator of clinical outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it