Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents Tulip, an ERD system submitted to the ERD 2014: Entity Recognition and Disambiguation Challenge. The objective of the proposed system is to spot mentions of entities in a document and link the mentions to corresponding Freebase articles. To achieve it, Tulip prunes the set of entity candidates focusing on a core subset of related entities capturing the context of the document. The relationship strength is measured as a similarity to a topic centroid generated from entity features. Each entity is represented by an accurate and compact feature vector extracted from a category graph built based on information from 120 language versions of Wikipedia. Given the core set of accepted entities Tulip uses the Wikipedia-based feature vectors to extract more related entities from the document text. Tulip received the first prize in the long document track with F1 score of 0.74, which confirms the effectiveness of our system. At the same, the system was faster than all other submissions with latency under 0.29 seconds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it