MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2074873246 · doi:10.3828/tpr.2011.41

Conference report: <i>The death and life of greenbelts: 'Local Solutions for Global Challenges', Toronto, 22–24 March 2011</i>

2011· article· en· W2074873246 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marco Amati, Laura E. Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenueTown Planning Review · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyEnvironmental scienceGerontologyDemographySociologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Toronto is famous among students of planning for its public transport, for being the most diverse city in North America and for being the city in which Jane Jacobs chose to make her home for decades. Perhaps in the future it may lay claim to having been the site of world's first Greenbelt Conference, 'Local Solutions for Global Challenges', and for bearing witness to an international movement to promote this longstanding planning policy. Aiming to bring all of the world's 'greenbelts together in one place for the first time', the promotional quality and hopeful rhetoric of this two-day event bore striking similarities to the propaganda and language of networks that surrounded the establishment of the greenbelt around London in the 1930s. Whereas British greenbelts can be seen to have declined by becoming less relevant to changing social and economic times, the mood at the Toronto conference was anything but despondent. Attendees were exuberant about the potential that a global greenbelts movement can play in addressing some of the most pressing planning concerns of the day. The conference showcased efforts to create and expand greenbelts worldwide and promoted the kind of multifunctionality that some British greenbelts lack. Examples were provided of greenbelts that provide climate change mitigation and adaptation, biodiversity conservation and green infrastructure, local food production, linear open space and recreation, and meaningful engagement with nature. Each of these functions was set in the cultural and policy contexts within which it was situated. For instance, the 'Iron Curtain Greenbelt', which was started in Germany to promote ecological health, historical awareness and recreation, is not placed in contrast to an urban area but to the surrounding industrial and intensively farmed countryside. Eschewing history, the conference promoted not simply a contemporary resurgence of the greenbelt, but rather its successful re-invention. Presentations, themes and conference content The conference combined presentations by policy-makers, academics and practitioners from many corners of the world, including Australia, Brazil, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, the United States and Canada. They spoke to an audience composed of Toronto area academics, farmers, politicians, environmentally interested residents as well as international delegates. Any thought that the greenbelt is a moribund twentieth-century planning policy was banished as the local organisers, the Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation (FGF), provided events for the audience centered very loosely around planning. These included: a music performance by local greenbelt activist Sarah Harmer; comedy sketches about greenbelts, planning and Canadians by the ensemble 'Second City'; a talk about the indigenous history of the Toronto greenbelt by noted archaeologist Dr Ron Williamson; and a keynote address by Margaret Atwood, who promised to tweet the 'Toronto Declaration for Global Greenbelts: Local Solutions for Global Challenges' to all of her 182,000 followers.1 Undoubtedly, had she been alive, Jane Jacobs would have been there too! During the plenary and panel sessions the content was designed to inspire, showing how the greenbelt is implemented in various parts of the world. The audience heard for example how the implementation of the Frankfurt greenbelt shaped the development of infrastructure and the airport on the urban fringe. Other addresses focused on using the greenbelt to stop sprawl around Warsaw, or using it to embed a biosphere reserve into the local physical planning of Sao Paulo. Only a few of the talks were rueful: the policy director of the US's Greenbelt Alliance spoke about non-governmental organisations' need to maintain constant vigilance to prevent environmentally insensitive development around the San Francisco Bay area in absence of government-led regional planning. The international flavour of the conference was further reinforced by the examples of boundary-crossing international greenbelts. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.703
Threshold uncertainty score0.591

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1170.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTown Planning ReviewSame topicAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryFrench-language works237,207