MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075149360 · doi:10.1163/15685390260514690

FEMALE MATING SWARMS INCREASE PREDATION RISK IN A 'ROLE-REVERSED' DANCE FLY (DIPTERA: EMPIDIDAE: RHAMPHOMYIA LONGICAUDA LOEW)

2002· article· en· W2075149360 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBehaviour · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPredationBiologyMatingDanceEcologyZoologyPopulationDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mate acquiring activities often expose males to increased risks of predation. In species where females are more competitive than males (i.e. a reversal in the conventional mating roles), the mate-acquiring biology of females is expected to increase their exposure to predators. Our observational study of a role-reversed dance fly, Rhamphomyia longicauda Loew (Empididae), supports this prediction. Within predominantly female swarms, R. longicauda display structures in flight that are assessed by males. Structural and behavioural components of the display should increase the risk of predation on females. We found more females than males captured in spider webs. This bias in predation was not due to a female-bias in population sex-ratios of the dance fly and the nature of web predation appears to rule out the hypothesis that spiders actively favour females as prey.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.605

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it