Heart Rate Response to Tilting in Newborns in Quiet and Active Sleep
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The heart rate response to tilting was investigated in active and quiet sleep in 19 normal newborns (age 1-7 days) and 11 healthy premature infants (age 2-19 days). RR intervals were determined by computer from the ECG for 30-60 s periods immediately before and after each tilt. Term infants had a significant (p less than 0.005) decrease in RR interval for head-up tilting and significant (p less than 0.005) increase in RR with head down tilts. There was no significant difference in the magnitude of RR change between upward and downward tilt or between active and quiet sleep. For premature infants, the response to tilting was similar to that of the term infants, especially with allowance for the faster heart rates of the former. Respiratory rate changes were an important source of variability in the heart rate response to tilting and are likely the source of previous inconsistencies. Our results indicate that healthy newborns have a well-developed heart rate response to tilting, suggesting considerable maturity of neural control of heart rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it