MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075397894 · doi:10.1080/17747120.2005.9692750

Approches expérimentales et numériques pour l'analyse dynamique d'un pont routier

2005· article· fr· W2075397894 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue française de génie civil · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsMinistère des Transports
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)Monte Carlo methodParametric statisticsStructural engineeringComputationBox girderFinite element methodComputer scienceEngineeringAlgorithmMathematicsGirder

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT This paper presents different aspects related to the application of dynamic analysis to bridge structures. Two particular aspects are exposed and applied to the case of an existing prestressed concrete box-girder bridge. At first, a modal analysis is performed. The structure is modeled using three dimensional finite elements and the computed modes are compared to those obtained from in situ experimental measurements. Thereafter, a complete dynamic analysis is done by time integration in order to simulate as precisely as possible the bridge behaviour. This computation takes into account the real dynamic interaction between the vehicles and the deformed structural model with an added roughness to the road surface. The results are then compared to those provided by field measurements. After such a validation of the model behavior, a parametric study of the dynamic amplification factor based on Monte Carlo generation of different parameters is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it