MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075676842 · doi:10.1176/pn.36.14.0009

Women Psychiatrists Still Battle Freud’s View of Sexes

2001· article· en· W2075676842 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatric News · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychoanalysisBattleNothingEmancipationPsychologyHuman sexualityPoliticsGender studiesSociologyPhilosophyLawHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Professional NewsFull AccessWomen Psychiatrists Still Battle Freud's View of SexesChristine LehmannChristine LehmannPublished Online:20 Jul 2001https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.36.14.0009What do women really want? If that question were asked of Sigmund Freud, the father of psychoanalysis, his answer would have been that they want to be wives and mothers.Donna Stewart, M.D.: Women psychiatrists tend to be promoted later in their careers than men psychiatrists despite having achieved the same accomplishments." Freud was a man of his times. He was opposed to the women's emancipation movement and believed that women's lives were dominated by their sexual reproductive functions," said Donna Stewart, M.D., professor and chair of women's health at the University Health Network in Toronto, Canada.Freud continued to believe as late as 1925 that the sexes were unequal in position and worth, said Stewart. In his paper "The Psychical Consequences of the Anatomic Distinction Between the Sexes," Freud wrote, "Women oppose change, receive passively, and add nothing of their own," said Stewart in a lecture at APA's 2001 annual meeting in May. Stewart is chair of the APA Committee on Women.Freud's "Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality" published in 1905 mention that women are envious of the "anatomically superior" male penis, thus giving rise to the phrase "penis envy," said Stewart.Unfortunately, Freud's views on women have been shared by some of his contemporaries in academic psychiatry in North America, according to Stewart."When I was a psychiatry resident at the University of Toronto in the 1970s, some of my peers asked the hospital chief, who was a psychiatrist, why their stipend was lower than the male residents. The response was they were suffering from penis envy, which could be cured by getting into analysis," said Stewart.She discovered in 1997, when she served on the Gender Issues Committee of the Council of Ontario Faculties of Medicine, that women faculty members were paid on average $15,000 less than their male counterparts at all ranks from instructor to full professor. "Sadly, the salary gap remains," said Stewart.When she asked university officials for an explanation, their response was, "When women are more qualified and around longer, they will earn the same salaries," said Stewart.She noted that similar salary discrepancies have been reported in academic institutions in the U.S., where "recent studies show that on average women are paid 70 percent of men's salaries," said Stewart.Women have not been promoted as frequently or as often as men have, Stewart discovered while recently serving on the University of Toronto's promotions committee. "Women psychiatrists are typically promoted later in their careers than their male counterparts despite having the same number of grants, publications, and research discoveries," she said."I suspect that men are more assertive than women in promoting their achievements. Modesty may be a virtue, but it certainly doesn't enhance women's career development," said Stewart.Her experience on numerous academic and hospital search committees in Ontario during the last seven years has revealed the pervasiveness of gender stereotypes that undermine women's career advancement, she noted."I have seen equally qualified men and women candidates being interviewed for high-level positions by a predominantly male search committee and have [the men's and women's] remarks interpreted quite differently," said Stewart.Organized psychiatry has made some progress in increasing the number of women in leadership positions. APA, for example, has had three women presidents—Carol Nadelson, M.D., Elissa Benedek, M.D., and Mary Jane England, M.D., noted Stewart.However, more women need to be appointed as committee chairs and nominated for APA office, said Stewart."We also need to continue to encourage industry-supported symposia at the annual meetings to have women speakers at each session.""Women bring an important perspective and knowledge to our profession. Considering that half of our members-in-training, one-third of practicing psychiatrists, and over half of our patients are women, it is critical that we are represented equitably in psychiatry's membership, leadership, education, research, theory, and practice, Steward emphasized. "Clearly, this is what women want." ▪ ISSUES NewArchived

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it