MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075917219 · doi:10.1239/jap/1245676104

Perturbed MAP Risk Models with Dividend Barrier Strategies

2009· article· en· W2075917219 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Probability · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsDividendMathematicsPenalty methodContext (archaeology)Markov processRisk modelMarkov chainBarrier optionRuin theoryApplied mathematicsEconometricsMathematical economicsMathematical optimizationStatisticsEconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of a dividend barrier strategy (see, e.g. Lin, Willmot and Drekic (2003)) we analyze the moments of the discounted dividend payments and the expected discounted penalty function for surplus processes with claims arriving according to a Markovian arrival process (MAP). We show that a relationship similar to the dividend-penalty identity of Gerber, Lin and Yang (2006) can be established for the class of perturbed MAP surplus processes, extending in the process some results of Li and Lu (2008) for the Markov-modulated risk model. Also, we revisit the same ruin-related quantities in an identical MAP risk model with the only exception that the barrier level effective at time t depends on the state of the underlying environment at this time. Similar relationships are investigated and derived. Numerical examples are also considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score0.730

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it