MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2075924621 · doi:10.1021/ja002021z

Binding Energies for Doubly-Charged Ions M<sup>2+</sup> = Mg<sup>2+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Zn<sup>2+</sup> with the Ligands L = H<sub>2</sub>O, Acetone and <i>N</i>-methylacetamide in Complexes M for <i>n</i> = 1 to 7 from Gas Phase Equilibria Determinations and Theoretical Calculations

2000· article· en· W2075924621 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryBinding energyEnthalpyBond-dissociation energyCrystallographyLigand (biochemistry)Dissociation (chemistry)Bond energyIonPolarizabilityBond lengthPhysical chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MoleculeAtomic physicsCrystal structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experimental and theoretical binding energies, entropies, and free energies are reported for M(L) n 2+ complexes, where M = Zn, Mg, Ca and L = acetone (Me 2 CO) and N -methylacetamide (MAcA), as well as water for comparison. For the theoretical binding energies, expressed as dissociation energies ( ), n extends up to 3 for the Mg-Me 2 CO system, while for the experimental binding energies, n starts as low as 5 for the Zn- and Mg-acetone systems and reaches as high as 9 for the Ca(MAcA) system. For n = 1 complexes, Zn exhibits the strongest binding (due to sdσ hybridization and charge transfer), followed by Mg and then Ca (primarily electrostatic binding, with Mg being smaller). For the ligands, the trend based on dipole and polarizability holds for n = 1, with MAcA exhibiting the strongest binding, followed by Me 2 CO and then H 2 O. However, as n increases, the bond enthalpies drop at rates that cause them to equalize within a few kcal/mol for n = 6. The observed trend of bond enthalpy equalization has been attributed to primarily ligand−ligand repulsion in the case of Mg and Ca complexes. For the Zn complexes, loss of sdσ hybridization and charge-transfer play an added role so that, for example, for Zn(H 2 O) 3 2+ and Zn(H 2 O) 4 2+, the binding energies are lower than for the Mg analogues, despite the shorter bond distance in the Zn complexes. The experimental bond enthalpy and entropy differences for M(Me 2 CO) n 2+, where M = Ca and Mg and n = 6 and 7, show a sharp drop that corresponds to a transition to an outer shell for the seventh Me 2 CO ligand. The entropies for the addition of the seventh ligand are much smaller than for the sixth ligand and correspond to a ligand that, due to the absence of ligand−ligand bonding interactions, is free to translate across the entire inner shell. The lower bond enthalpy and entropy for Zn as compared to Ca and Mg indicate that the transition to an outer shell is earlier for Zn. The strong hydrogen bonding between outer-shell and inner-shell MAcA ligands, indicated for Ca(MAcA) 7 2+, allows earlier transitions to an outer shell for Zn- and Mg-MAcA complexes as compared to their acetone analogues. Implications of the ligand interactions in the experimentally observed Ca complexes to Ca-containing proteins is also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it