MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2076165157 · doi:10.1145/1385989.1386019

Distributed automatic service composition in large-scale systems

2008· article· en· W2076165157 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaOntario Innovation Trust
KeywordsComputer sciencePublicationScalabilityDistributed computingService compositionService (business)Service discoveryProcess (computing)Matching (statistics)Web serviceDatabaseWorld Wide WebOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Automatic service composition is an active research area in the field of service computing. This paper presents a distributed approach to automatically discover a composition of services based on the desired input to and output from the process. The algorithm makes use of the content-based publish/subscribe model, with service inputs modeled as subscriptions, and outputs as advertisements. Service interfaces are mapped to publish/subscribe messages in such a way that publish/subscribe matching is used to evaluate service compatibility. In this way, large-scale distributed service composition and process discovery is achieved with a distributed publish/subscribe network. Evaluations in a distributed environment of a real implementation of the system demonstrate the scalability of the distributed approach, especially with respect to the number of services, the complexity of the discovered processes, and the number of concurrent searches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it