Ambulatory oncology nursing telephone services: A provincial survey
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A survey of telephone nursing provided through ambulatory oncology programs in Ontario was conducted May to July 2006. Of 38 programs, 58% used primary nurses, 24% used a centralized triage approach, and 18% used a mixed model. About half of programs used protocols (61%), routinely documented calls (55%), and/or provided orientation to telephone nursing (45%). Few programs (29%) monitored telephone service quality. Practice strengths included: improved patient access, early symptom management, and increased continuity of care. Revealed barriers to using protocols were limited access to or awareness of protocols, management of multiple symptoms, inconsistencies with physician practices, concern that protocols replace critical thinking, inadequate time, and lack of electronic protocols. Participants acknowledged the need for electronic documentation, standardized criteria to monitor service quality, and further research to benchmark best practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it