MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On a Classical Risk Model with a Constant Dividend Barrier

2005· article· en· W2076375040 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNorth American Actuarial Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbability and Risk Models
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDividendRuin theoryRisk modelLaplace transformConstant (computer programming)Expression (computer science)MathematicsMathematical economicsDistribution (mathematics)EconometricsEconomicsJoint probability distributionFirst-hitting-time modelValue (mathematics)Applied mathematicsMathematical analysisStatisticsComputer scienceFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper considers a risk model with a constant dividend barrier. It first points out interesting connections between some previous results for this model and those for spectrally negative Lévy processes. An expression is then obtained for the joint distribution of the surplus immediately prior to ruin and the deficit at ruin, discounted from the time of ruin. Such an expression involves known results on the joint distribution at ruin for a classical risk model without barrier. Also discussed are the joint distributions related to the time periods when dividends are paid. In particular, this paper obtains the Laplace transform for the total dividend payments until ruin, and another expression for the expected present value of the total amount of dividend payments until ruin. The results do not require the positive loading condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it