Solution Properties of Conventional Gum Arabic and a Matured Gum Arabic (<i>Acacia</i> (sen) SUPER GUM)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dilute solution properties of two specially matured gum arabic samples (EM1 and EM2) were compared to the conventional gum (EM0) using static light scattering. The apparent molar mass (M(w,app) and radius of gyration (R(g,app)) for the three samples showed unusual concentration dependence. These data were satisfactorily interpreted by a simple association model that takes into account the repulsive interaction among clusters, which allowed us to obtain the true molar mass (Mw(0)) and radius of gyration (Rg(0)). A common power law relation was observed between Mw(0) and Rg(0) , giving a somewhat higher exponent than expected for linear and branched polymers in a good solvent. Mw(0) and Rg(0) obtained for the three gums do not differ significantly from each other. However, the data showed clearly a constant increase of the association from EM0 to EM2 with increasing concentration. This is in accordance with the previously observed improved functional properties for the matured products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".