MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077382122 · doi:10.3928/00220124-20100701-07

Alice Through the Looking Glass: The Influence of Self and Student Understanding on Role Actualization Among Novice Clinical Nurse Educators

2010· article· en· W2077382122 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicNursing education and management
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic shortageCLARITYMetaphorAlice (programming language)Nurse educatorTransition (genetics)Nurse practitionersPsychologyMedical educationRegistered nurseNursingMedicineNurse educationComputer sciencePolitical scienceHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In response to a shortage of qualified academicians, the past decade has seen nurses who are expert practitioners move into the role of clinical faculty. Although the literature on this transition is emerging, little is known about how expert practitioners actualize that transition or the prescribed paths to follow. This article describes how the understanding of self and student assists in actualizing the role of clinical nurse educator. The author uses a metaphor of Alice stepping through the looking glass to present three dimensions that expert practitioners pass through in their journey to clinical nurse educator. A conceptual model is provided to enhance clarity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it