MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077601907 · doi:10.1353/not.2011.0172

I Don't Sound Like Nobody: Remaking Music in 1950s America (review)

2011· article· en· W2077601907 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNotes · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMusic History and Culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsnobodyPortraitMusicalPopular musicHarpsichordArt historyHistoryArtFunkWhite (mutation)Performance artPianoVisual artsLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

POPULAR, AND PEOPLES I Don't Sound Like Nobody: Remaking Music in 1950s America. By Albin J. Zak III. (Tracking Pop, no. 3.) Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2010. [308 p. ISBN 9780472116379. $29.95.] Bio - graphical references, index, discography. In I Don't Sound Like Nobody, Albin Zak adroitly synthesizes the way in which various strands of music combined to become what is known today as rock and roll. Popular music in America underwent dramatic upheaval in the 1950s as disparate types of music were combined in unusual ways. For example, see Rosemary Clooney's 1951 hit Come On-A My House, which occupied the #1 spot for eight weeks. Featuring wonderfully anachronistic boogie-woogie harpsichord accompaniment, this record is one of hundreds that Zak discusses in his book. He provides musical descriptions born from keen ear and includes portraits of important performers, producers, and disc jockeys both well known and obscure in the industry. But perhaps his most important contributions are the interesting and evocative episodes that illustrate the transition from swing to the rock era. In his first chapters, Zak details number of technological changes that laid the foundation for music's evolution. Local radio stations expanded their signals, thereby eroding what were often rigid social and regional musical divisions. Powerful stations in Chicago beamed black music (originally termed race records) into the homes of white America, while Nashville's stations introduced country and western music to listeners from New Orleans to Detroit. Yet the most radical changes occurred during the production of the records themselves. Arrangers and producers manipulated recorded sounds in more extravagant ways, enabling less-polished performers and novelty acts to achieve successes normally restricted to mainstream artists. Making hits was all that mattered, which meant listeners' responses were record man's chief guide (p. 83). Even as established producers and executives expressed ambivalence about the new aesthetics dominating the marketplace, they nonetheless felt the need to provide the latest hit record. Zak brightens his narrative in the third chapter, Hustlers and Amateurs, by introducing an assortment of colorful characters. These men populated series of small, independent record companies outside the main centers of record production, namely New York and Los Angeles. Despite their small size, these so-called indies were heavy players in the marketplace and introduced singer's emotion or feel as newly prized element in hit record. Various producers, writers, and engineers make appearances in this chapter: in Clovis, New Mexico, Norman Petty inspired Buddy Knox, Roy Orbison and Buddy Holly; in Chicago, the Chess brothers produced pivotal artists including Muddy Waters and Chuck Berry. But it was Sam Phillips in Memphis, Tennessee, who discovered Elvis Presley, an artist who synthesized and transformed the traditions of blues, pop, and country. In other words, Phillips discovered new way to stimulate the marketplace. In chapter 4, Zak details how the pop market became saturated with elements from various distinct strands of music (country and western, rhythm and blues, gospel, jazz, etc). The technique of covering instigated this process. By tracing the development of song from one style to more polished cover, Zak reveals complex relationships between the different versions of single song. For example, see Zak's discussion of the song Sh-Boom: originally in 1954 by the Chords, quintet of black men born in the Bronx, Sh-Boom was punctuated by extended phrases of non-sense syllables. And its music, though somehow infectious, was repetitive nearly to the point of minimalism (p. 128). Soon thereafter, the Crew Cuts, group of white men born in Canada, produced version that was a stylized declamation rendering the song but not the attitude of the original recording (p. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.129 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNotesSame topicMusic History and CultureFrench-language works237,207