MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2077898824 · doi:10.1115/1.1596552

Mechanical Fault Detection Based on the Wavelet De-Noising Technique

2004· article· en· W2077898824 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of vibration and acoustics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWaveletMorlet waveletThresholdingImpulse (physics)Computer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Impulse noiseWavelet transformFault detection and isolationArtificial intelligenceAcousticsMathematicsAlgorithmSpeech recognitionDiscrete wavelet transformPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For gears and roller bearings, periodic impulses indicate that there are faults in the components. However, it is difficult to detect the impulses at the early stage of fault because they are rather weak and often immersed in heavy noise. Existing wavelet threshold de-noising methods do not work well because they use orthogonal wavelets, which do not match the impulse very well and do not utilize prior information on the impulse. A new method for wavelet threshold de-noising is proposed in this paper; it not only employs the Morlet wavelet as the basic wavelet for matching the impulse, but also uses the maximum likelihood estimation for thresholding by utilizing prior information on the probability density of the impulse. This method has performed excellently when used to de-noise mechanical vibration signals with a low signal-to-noise ratio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it